Ormonde

Ormonde v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 3d 889·173 Cal. Rptr. 79·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 1607
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 1981Civ. 19324California735 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paras, J.

Plaintiff appeals from denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to compel the Depart ment of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to vacate its suspension of his driver’s license (Veh. Code, § 13353).

The facts are not in dispute. Patrolman Wolf of the Tracy Police Department stopped the vehicle plaintiff was driving after observing it cross the double yellow line several times within a short distance. After administering a set of field sobriety tests, which plaintiff “failed,” Wolf told plaintiff he was being detained for possible drunk driving, placed him in the back seat of his patrol car, and transported him to the police station for chemical testing. On the way to the station, Wolf told plaintiff about the chemical tests and advised him he “could” lose his driver’s license if he refused to take one of the tests. He also said if plaintiff “passed” a chemical test he would be released and returned to his vehicle.

When they arrived at the station, Wolf again explained that defendant “could” lose his license if he refused a test. Plaintiff’s response was that he wanted to talk to his attorney. Wolf told plaintiff he did not have the right , to see an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.