Weathington

People v. Weathington

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 616·231 Cal. App. 3d 69·282 Cal. Rptr. 170·91 Daily Journal DAR 6928·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4444
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 1991H007551California7,379 words

Opinion

Opinion

Premo, J.

Defendant David Livingston Weathington appeals from conviction at jury trial of one count each of felony driving under the influence of alcohol with three or more priors for which he received a prison sentence, and misdemeanor driving on a suspended license. He claims that the court erred in instructing the jury and in refusing to bifurcate the trial of the priors. We agree with the latter contention, and therefore vacate the sentence. However, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

Facts

On April 14, 1990, appellant drove into a gas station and pulled up at the full-service bay to buy gas. He exited his car and asked the attendant, Richard Gill, to fill the gas tank and check the oil. Gill noticed a fuel line leak, so appellant moved the car away from the gas pumps to be fixed. Exiting again, appellant confided to the cashier, Chris Olsen, that he had drunk a six-pack and felt good, and inquired where he could find a liquor store. Both employees thought appellant was intoxicated: he had slurred speech and staggered when he walked.

There was a liquor store across the street; appellant went there and returned from five to ten minutes later with a wine cooler for himself…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.