Curtin

Curtin v. Koskey

Bad Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 749·231 Cal. App. 3d 873·282 Cal. Rptr. 706·91 Daily Journal DAR 7935·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5017
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 1991A047762California1,715 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dossee, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon plaintiffs’ failure to bring the action to trial within three years. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in granting the motion to dismiss when another judge had previously granted plaintiffs’ motion to advance and had set the case for trial. We agree and reverse.

Facts

In October 1983, plaintiffs Tim and Darlene Curtin purchased a used mobilehome from defendants Thomas and Patricia Koskey for $49,969. They soon discovered various defects in the mobilehome and on September 21, 1984, brought suit against the Koskeys and others (the Koskeys’ real estate agent and the manager of the mobilehome park) for breach of contract and fraud.

Plaintiffs were represented in the action by an attorney, Kenneth Kaplan. Mr. Kaplan advised plaintiffs to stop paying rent at the mobilehome park, and plaintiffs followed that advice. In 1984, the mobilehome park owner, Carlsberg Mobile Home Properties, Ltd., brought an unlawful detainer action, which was eventually resolved by a stipulated judgment against the Curtins for $4,800. Some time thereafter, before June 1985, the mobilehome was sold at a sheriff’s sale…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.