Earp

Earp v. Earp

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 751·231 Cal. App. 3d 1008·283 Cal. Rptr. 43·91 Daily Journal DAR 7925·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5123
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 1991A050584California2,390 words

Opinion

Opinion

King, J.

In this case we hold that where the lease of a mobilehome park was intended to be security for payment of a debt, the lease was in effect a mortgage, and thus the lessee’s rights to accrued profits from operation of the mobilehome park were limited to the amount of the debt, plus interest. Doris N. Earp appeals from a judgment determining that she owed $290,656 plus interest to her former husband, Kenneth H. Earp, pursuant to her lease of the mobilehome park from Kenneth. We affirm.

A 1983 judgment of dissolution required Kenneth to pay Doris $723,341 plus interest to equalize the division of community property. Both parties appealed. In an unpublished decision, we modified the judgment to correct a mathematical error. (In re Marriage of Earp (Feb. 1, 1988) A024976.)

While the appeal was pending, Doris obtained and recorded a writ of execution on the mobilehome park. Kenneth asked Doris to stay her writ, and she indicated she would do so provided she would have adequate security. As a result, on June 30, 1987, the parties negotiated a five-year lease of the park to Doris. Under the terms of the lease, Doris paid the park’s operating expenses, assumed Kenneth’s insurance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.