Lick Mill Creek Apartments v. Chicago Title Insurance

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 787·231 Cal. App. 3d 1654·283 Cal. Rptr. 231·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5509
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 1991H006961California3,996 words

Opinion

Opinion

Agliano, J.

Plaintiffs Lick Mill Creek Apartments and Prometheus Development Company, Inc., appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, the demurrer of defendants Chicago Title Insurance Company and First American Title Insurance Company to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. The trial court determined, based on undisputed facts alleged in the complaint, that title insurance policies issued by defendants did not provide coverage for the costs of removing hazardous substances from plaintiffs’ property. For the reasons stated below, we conclude the trial court’s ruling was correct and affirm the judgment.

Scope, of Review

“A general demurrer presents the same question to the appellate court as to the trial court, namely, whether the plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to justify any relief, notwithstanding superfluous allegations or claims for unjustified relief. [Citations.] ‘[T]he allegations of the complaint must be liberally construed with a view to attaining substantial justice among the parties. (Code Civ. Proc., § 452.)’ [Citation.] Pleading defects which do not affect substantial rights of the parties should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.