City of Bell Gardens v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 755·231 Cal. App. 3d 1563·283 Cal. Rptr. 91·91 Daily Journal DAR 7983·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5259
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 2, 1991B048866California4,106 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ortega, J.

We conclude the trial court properly enjoined defendants County of Los Angeles and the Sheriff’s Department of the County of Los Angeles from unlawfully interfering with the playing of pai gow, pai gow poker, and pan 9 at the Bell Gardens Bicycle Club, the California Commerce Club, the El Dorado Club, and the Normandie Club (the card clubs). We affirm the judgment and impose sanctions on appeal against the county.

Background

Pai gow, pai gow poker and pan 9 (the pai gow games) share a common betting format: The position of dealer rotates systematically among the players and each player has the opportunity to act as dealer for two consecutive rounds. The player/dealer makes the initial bet, and the other players bet against him. The player/dealer pays off winners and collects from losers, but only until the player/dealer wins or loses his initial wager. Thereafter, the round of play terminates even though there are remaining players at the table who have winning or losing hands. Accordingly, the player/dealer is not required to pay all winners, and the player/dealer may only collect from losers up to the amount the player/dealer wagered.

The county and the sheriff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.