Alexander D. v. State Board of Dental Examiners

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 621·231 Cal. App. 3d 92·282 Cal. Rptr. 201·91 Daily Journal DAR 7037·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4481
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 1991A048932California2,297 words

Opinion

Opinion

Newsom, J.

This case concerns the constitutionality of Business and Professions Code section 820, dealing with possible mental incompetency of a licensed dentist.

Statement of Facts and Procedure

Appellant Alexander D., a practicing dentist licensed by the State of California, appeals from an order of the superior court denying his motion for preliminary injunction to enjoin the Board of Dental Examiners (respondent or Board) from ordering him to submit to a psychiatric examination.

On November 28, 1989, appellant was served with an order and petition issued by the Board compelling him to undergo a psychiatric examination on January 16, 1990. The petition alleged a factual basis for the ordered examination based on appellant’s bizarre statements and conduct.

An attached report from a reviewing psychiatrist opined that it was “highly probable that [appellant was] suffering from emotional/mental psychiatric, psychological problems.”

At the request of appellant’s counsel, the examination was rescheduled for January 23, 1990.

On January 9, 1990, appellant filed a complaint for injunctive relief, request for temporary injunction and application for temporary restraining order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.