Lee v. Superior Court

Good Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 43·63 Cal. App. 3d 705
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 1976Civ. 48883California1,457 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kaus, J.

Petitioner Enrietta Lee, and real party in interest, Harry Jay Lee, are involved in a marriage dissolution proceeding. The trial court, on Harry’s motion, ordered “pendente lite” the release of a lis pendens recorded by Enrietta against property asserted by her to belong to the community, and, at the same time, authorized the sale of that property, the proceeds to be used to pay debts owing in a business operated by Harry and claimed by him to be his separate property. The trial court stayed its order pending the filing of a petition for extraordinary writ by Enrietta. We granted the alternative writ and ordered that the trial court’s stay order be continued in effect.

Facts

The facts are based on the documents submitted by the parties in connection with Harry’s motion to release the lis pendens and to authorize the sale of the property. Other than this documentation and the balance of the superior court file, the trial court had no other information before it.

In the dissolution action, Enrietta claims that the community property included a floor covering business, the real property on which the business was located, a duplex in which the parties had lived, and an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.