Elder

People v. Elder

Bad Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 212·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 2122·63 Cal. App. 3d 731
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 1976Crim. 7591California2,553 words

Opinion

Opinion

Defendant Elder was found guilty by a jury of 1 count of conspiracy to commit bookmaking (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. 1) and 29 counts of violation of Penal Code section 337a (hookmaking). Defendant Hatrick was found guilty of 1 count of conspiracy to commit bookmaking (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. 1) and 27 counts of violation of Penal Code section 337a (bookmaking).

Both defendants were granted probation.

Facts

Ronald Mitre, an undercover operative in a bookmaking investigation by the Orange County District Attorney’s Organized Crime Unit, on JunelL 197^ contacted George Brazer at the Blue and White Cab Company and indicated he was interested in becoming associated with Brazer’s bookmaking operation. Brazer indicated that Mitre would be contacted by a person named Al. Contact was made between Al and Mitre later that day, Mitre identifying himself as Ron Barnett. A meeting was arranged for the Marquis Lounge in Anaheim.

Mitre, wearing a recording device, met as scheduled with A1 Hickin. Hickin gave Mitre a piece of paper containing the name Sam, a phone number, and the notation Ron 29. Mitre apparently called the phone number given him by Hickin and asked for Sam. A female…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.