Oceanic California, Inc. v. North Central Coast Regional Commission

Caution
133 Cal. Rptr. 664·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1989·63 Cal. App. 3d 57
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 1976Civ. 37893California8,189 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Appellant, a land developer, has appealed from a judgment that denied its petition for a writ of administrative mandamus in which it sought, among other relief, a judgment that it was entitled to an exemption from the provisions of the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act of 1972 (Pub. Resources Code, § 27000 et seq.) to the full extent requested in its application (see Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 14, §§ 13700-13707; and State of California v. Superior Court (Veta Co.) (1974) 12 Cal.3d 237, 249-250 [ 115 Cal.Rptr. 497 , 524 P.2d 1281 ]) that had been denied by each of respondent commissions. The respondent commissions have filed a cross-appeal in which they seek review of rulings of the court with respect to the admission of evidence and settlement of the findings.

Petitioner concedes that it has not secured a building permit, as required by the provisions of section 27404 of the Public Resources Code. It contends that under the particular circumstances of this case, a sequence of approvals and. actions taken pursuant to a planned unit development zoning approval, it acquired a vested right to complete the development; and that, therefore, section 27404 should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.