Elam

Elam v. College Park Hospital

Bad Law
132 Cal. App. 3d 332·183 Cal. Rptr. 156·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1619
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 27, 1982Civ. 24479California5,784 words

Opinion

Opinion

Work, J.

The pivotal question presented by this appeal is whether a hospital is liable to a patient under the doctrine of corporate negligence for negligent conduct of independent physicians and surgeons who, as members of the hospital staff, avail themselves of the hospital facilities, but who are neither employees nor agents of the hospital. We answer this question in the affirmative and reverse the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

After Sophia Elam filed a complaint alleging medical malpractice against doctors Martin J. Schur, Merrill F. Cahn and Samuel Markarian, and College Park Hospital (Hospital), Hospital was granted summary judgment.

Elam complains Schur, a licensed podiatrist, performed negligent podiatric surgery at Hospital to correct bilateral bunions and bilateral hammer toes. She was admitted to Hospital for surgery by Schur and Markarian, a medical doctor, pursuant to a hospital coadmission procedure requiring concurrence of a medical doctor before admitting a podiatric patient and the physician’s assumption of responsibility for the overall medical care of that patient, including the taking of a medical history and the performance of a physical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.