Cory

Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Cory

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 3d 852·183 Cal. Rptr. 475·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1670
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 1982Civ. 53393California2,699 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scott, J.

Petitioners are a coalition of organizations, health care providers, and taxpayers who represent the interests of indigent women throughout the state. Petitioners filed an original petition for writ of mandate with the California Supreme Court, seeking to compel respondents State Controller Kenneth Cory, State Treasurer Jesse M. Unruh, and Director of the State’s Department of Health Beverlee A. Myers to refrain from enforcing those provisions of item 426-101-001 through item 426-101-890 of the Budget Act of 1981 which limit the funding of abortions sought by Medi-Cal recipients. Pursuant to that court’s order, the proceeding was transferred to this court, and we have issued an alternative writ. The Supreme Court has also directed respondents to refrain from implementing the provisions at issue, pending determination of the petition for mandamus.

The abortion funding restrictions in the 1981 Budget Act are identical with those in the Budget Acts of 1979 and 1980 which the California Supreme Court has already declared invalid under the California Constitution. (Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers (1981) 29 Cal.3d 252 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 866 , 625 P.2d 779 ].) In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.