Altieri

Fire Insurance Exchange v. Altieri

Caution
1 Cal. Rptr. 2d 360·1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1293·235 Cal. App. 3d 1352·91 Daily Journal DAR 13866·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8961
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1991H007931California4,032 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cottle, J.

—During an altercation, Fire Insurance Exchange’s insured, Michael Joseph Altieri, a minor, struck another minor, Greg Story, in the face. Story sued Altieri for damages for assault and battery and sued Altieri’s parents for negligent supervision. Pursuant to a stipulated judgment, Altieri and his parents were required to pay Story $310,000 for his injuries if their homeowner’s insurance provided coverage or $5,000 if it did not. Fire Insurance Exchange sought a declaration of its rights and obligations under the policy. After a court trial, the court ruled that Fire Insurance Exchange was required to indemnify Altieri for Story’s damages. Relying on Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 865 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 285 , 587 P.2d 1098 ] (Clemmer) for the proposition that coverage is mandated unless the insurer can prove its insured acted with a “ ‘preconceived design to inflict injury,’ ” (id. at p. 887) the court noted, “I think obviously the evidence is clear that the minor intentionally hit the other minor [but] I couldn’t find any evidence that he intended to commit the injury that occurred. ... I look at it a little bit, as I mentioned, analogous to, in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.