Parento

People v. Parento

Caution
1 Cal. Rptr. 2d 444·1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1287·235 Cal. App. 3d 1378·91 Daily Journal DAR 13883·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8949
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1991Docket Nos. A048190, A048806California967 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stein, J.

—A jury found (1) that Richard Lee Parento had committed the felony of second degree burglary, (2) that he was legally sane at the time of the commission of that crime, and (3) that he had suffered the prior convictions and had served the separate prison terms alleged in the information filed against him.

Appellate counsel, pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 839 , 600 P.2d 1071 ], requested this court to conduct an independent review of the record to determine whether the appeal presented any arguable appellate issues. We did so. Our review disclosed that Parento had elected to represent himself, that he sought a continuance on the day of trial, which request was denied; that he then requested appointment of counsel, which request also was denied; and that he then refused to participate further in the proceedings, and thus was absent from the trial. Accordingly, we directed counsel to brief the following issue:

Discussion

I.

Parento’s Request to Represent Himself

III.

Parento’s Absence at Trial

After the court denied Parento’s requests for a continuance for an attorney, Parento unequivocally refused to participate in the trial. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.