Ivester

People v. Ivester

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1191·235 Cal. App. 3d 328·286 Cal. Rptr. 2d 540·286 Cal. Rptr. 540·91 Daily Journal DAR 12844
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 17, 1991Docket Nos. D009731, D013585California3,607 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiener, J.

—Defendant Donald Ivester agreed to plead guilty to unlawfully manufacturing methamphetamine in excess of one pound (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.6, subd. (a)) and endangering a child (Pen. Code, § 273a) in exchange for the district attorney dismissing two additional felonies with which he was charged. In this appeal from the judgment he contends his guilty pleas were unknowingly and involuntarily made. In his consolidated petition for writ of habeas corpus he seeks relief on a similar ground asserting his pleas were induced by his counsel’s inaccurate statement that the appellate court would review his unsuccessful motion to disclose the identity of the confidential informant. Although Ivester has failed to file the statement required by section 1237.5, we nonetheless examine his appellate arguments to determine whether he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. In doing so we conclude defense counsel was deficient in failing to file the statement, but decide counsel’s oversight did not actually prejudice Ivester. We therefore affirm the judgment. We also deny his petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The Appeal

Ivester’s opening brief contains three separate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.