Chavira

Chavira v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1211·235 Cal. App. 3d 463·286 Cal. Rptr. 600·91 Daily Journal DAR 12950·1991 WL 211201
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 21, 1991B051525California4,881 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ortega, J.

—Respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) determined the application for workers’ compensation benefits in this asbestos case is barred by the statute of limitations. We conclude substantial evidence does not support the Board’s finding that more than one year before the application was filed applicant knew or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known he had disability that was caused by his employment. We therefore annul the Board’s decision after reconsideration and remand for further proceedings.

Facts

Ernest Chavira, applicant, was employed by Johns-Manville Sales Corporation (Manville) from October 24, 1952, through May 23, 1958. During his employment by Manville, applicant had extensive exposure to asbestos. Although applicant subsequently obtained other employment, including employment as a mechanic by Pan Pacific Fisheries from 1978 to 1987, there is no contention of any industrial exposure to asbestos after the Manville employment.

In January 1981 applicant had an upper respiratory infection during which he coughed up blood. Several weeks later, he was hospitalized because of transient ischemic attacks and a possible stroke. A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.