Johnson v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 3d 429·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1597·94 Cal. Rptr. 68
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1971Civ. 27717California2,537 words

Opinion

Opinion

Devine, J.

This lawsuit consists of cross-actions to quiet title to a strip of land. The principal question is whether a grant “for railroad purposes” conveyed a fee simple or only an easement. In 1906, Burlington Beach Land Company deeded a lot in what is now the City of Pacifica to Ocean Shore Railway Company. (Appellant, successor, bears the less British name of Ocean Shore Railroad Company.)

The deed, written in handsome script by a scrivener, contains in the part which includes the grant itself, paragraphs which we denominate A, B, and C, for convenience in later discussion, but these letters are our own designation. It reads: A. “That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) gold coin of the United States of America, to it in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold, conveyed and confirmed, and by these presents does grant, bargain and sell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of the second part, and to its successors and assigns forever, for railroad purposes only, all that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.