Stevens

Stevens v. Watson

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 3d 629·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1619·94 Cal. Rptr. 190
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 1971Civ. 36878California4,478 words

Opinion

Opinion

Frampton, J.

Statement of the Case

Appellants bring this action as taxpayers challenging the constitutionality of section 2.6 of article XIII of the California Constitution relating to the property taxation of nonprofit golf courses. Respondent’s demurrer to appellants’ petition for mandate and declaratory relief against Philip E. Watson as the assessor of Los Angeles County was sustained without leave to amend. Appellants stated for the record that they did not wish to amend, and have appealed from the judgment (order of dismissal).

Section 2.6 of article XIII, added to the California Constitution in 1960 provides: “In assessing real property consisting of one parcel of 10 acres or more and used exclusively for nonprofit golf course purposes for at least two successive years prior to the assessment, the assessor shall consider no factors other than those relative to such use. He may, however, take into consideration the existence of any mines, minerals and quarries in the property, including, but not limited to oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances.”

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the foregoing provision of the California Constitution is repugnant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.