King

King v. Regents of University of California

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 3d 812·189 Cal. Rptr. 189·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 2282
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 1, 1982Civ. 21524California2,820 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carr, J.

Appellant James King sought mandate in Yolo County Superior Court to compel the Regents of the University of California to conduct a full adversary hearing on the decision to deny him tenure and to disclose the entire contents of his tenure file. Following denial of the requested relief, appellant appeals to this court.

The Facts

The University of California has established a procedural mechanism for admission to its professorial ranks. There are four titles or ranks in the professor series: (1) instructor; (2) assistant professor; (3) associate professor; and (4) professor. The positions of associate professor and professor are subject to tenure; assistant professor and instructor are not. Each appointment as an assistant professor is for a maximum of two years, and total university service at this academic level is limited to eight years. The university regulations contemplate that at some point during the appointment as an assistant professor, the person will undergo a formal appraisal as a candidate for a tenured position.

The tenure review process involves extensive evaluation of the candidate on several levels. Tenure appraisal is made by other faculty members of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.