Saville

People v. Saville

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 3d 970·188 Cal. Rptr. 376·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 2290
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1982Crim. 42013California1,401 words

Opinion

Opinion

Roth, J.

Respondent was committed to Atascadero State Hospital in 1973 pursuant to Penal Code section 1026 after having been found not guilty by reason of insanity of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)) and assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder (Pen. Code, § 217). His maximum term of commitment was set at 2,190 days, a period he maintained expired on October 9, 1981.

On October 14, 1981, a petition for extended commitment was filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County pursuant to Penal Code section 1026.5. Asserting lack of jurisdiction based on the termination of his commitment, respondent sought and obtained a writ of habeas corpus dismissing the petition. This appeal followed. We affirm.

During the course of commitment, respondent was at various times granted outpatient status, which was in turn periodically curtailed on account of respondent’s unacceptable behaviour. On some of these occasions of curtailment, respondent, rather than being returned to Atascadero, was hospitalized in other institutions under provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code sections 5150 and 5250, part of the so-called Lanterman-Petris-Short Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.