City of Modesto v. Modesto Irrigation District

Good Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 111·1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 819·34 Cal. App. 3d 504
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 1973Docket Nos. 1700, 1701California1,614 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gargano, J.

Respondent, the City of Modesto; is a municipality operating under a home rule charter. Appellants, the Modesto and Turlock Irrigation Districts, are state agencies functioning pursuant to the provisions of the Irrigation District Law as set forth in division 11, commencing with section 20500 of the Water Code; they are presently distributing and selling electrical energy within the boundaries of the chartered city,

In 1970 respondent adopted a utility users’ tax ordinance imposing a tax upon every person in the city who uses water, gas, electricity and telephone service; the tax, in the amount of 5 percent of the monthly or bi-monthly utility charge, is paid by the service user (the consumer), but must be collected by the service supplier. The districts refused to collect the tax and the city instituted this litigation in the court below to compel them to do so; the districts filed a joint appeal from the adverse judgments which followed.

Appellants do not, nor can they, deny that the city’s utility users’ tax is a valid exercise of a chartered city’s power to tax for revenue purposes. (Rivera v. City of Fresno, 6 Cal.3d 132 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 281 , 490 P.2d 793 ].) Nor do…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.