Helmholtz

People v. Helmholtz

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 3d 441·1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1852·88 Cal. Rptr. 743
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 10, 1970Crim. 3837California3,420 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gardner, J.

Defendant was indicted for selling LSD and for selling amphetamine, both in violation of section 11912 of the Health and Safety Code. He was found guilty after a court trial and this appeal is from the' judgment of conviction.

Defendant contends: (1) that he was denied a fair trial by the prosecution circumventing his obtaining as a witness, Nicky Colangelo, an in former, who was a material percipient witness; and (2) the prosecution failed to comply with a mandate of Eleazer v. Superior Court, 1 Cal.3d 847 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 586 , 464 P.2d 42 ], in regard to the same witness.

A lengthy statement of the facts is unnecessary on the issues raised. Suffice to say that a state narcotic agent, Kenneth Curtis, purchased one capsule of LSD and a “dime bag” of methedrine from defendant. Nicky Colangelo, an informer, working with Mr. Curtis, actually purchased the LSD in Curtis’ presence with funds supplied by Curtis. Colangelo also was present when Curtis purchased the methedrine. Curtis paid defendant $5 and $4 of city funds, respectively, for the drugs. It was stipulated that the drugs purchased contained useable amounts of LSD and amphetamine.

The defendant took the stand on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.