People v. Williams

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 3d 638·89 Cal. Rptr. 143
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 197017201California2,014 words

Opinion

Opinion

By grand jury indictment, Douglas Turnbeau, George Jordan and appellant Williams were accused of murdering Brian Clay. Appellant's trial was severed from that of the others; he was tried by a jury, found guilty of second degree murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 189) and now appeals. He makes five contentions.

(1) Appellant first contends his conviction rests solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of Turnbeau, an accomplice, in violation of Penal Code, section 1111. [1] We disagree.

At approximately 9:15-9:30 p.m. the night of December 9, 1968, Brian Clay left his fraternity house on 28th Street, near the University of Southern California campus, to go to the car of a fraternity brother. The automobile was parked at the curbing near the intersection of West 28th and South Hoover Streets in Los Angeles. Defendant Turnbeau was granted immunity pursuant to Penal Code, section 1324. He testified that he, Jordan and appellant were walking up 28th Street when the victim was seen coming from the fraternity house and going toward the parked car. Appellant pulled an "instrument" (later identified as a two-edged knife) from his waistband or trousers' pocket and ran forward.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.