Sherar

Sherar v. B & E CONVALESCENT CENTER

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 505·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1200·49 Cal. App. 3d 227
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1975Civ. 45430California1,306 words

Opinion

Opinion

Compton, J.

Eileen Wampler was a nurse’s aid employed by B & E Convalescent Center. At approximately 6:50 in the morning on August 16, 1972, she was backing out of her driveway preparatory to driving to her place of employment. Plaintiffs Warren and Kevin Sherar who were riding on a motorcycle, collided with Eileen Wampler’s automobile and suffered injury.

Plaintiffs commenced an action against Eileen Wampler and her employer, B & E Convalescent Center (employer). Employer moved for summary judgment and upon documents which were properly before the court the motion was granted on the grounds that at the time of the accident Eileen Wampler was not in the course and scope of her employment, leaving no triable issue of fact as to the liability of the employer.

The evidence presented no factual dispute. Eileen Wampler’s regular duty hours were 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., and all of her duties were performed at one location—the B & E Convalescent Center at 14819 South Vermont in the City of Gardena. She was never required to travel to any other location to perform any services incident to her employment. No arrangements had ever been made to have her travel time considered as a part of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.