Lane

Lane v. City of Redondo Beach

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 189·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1202·49 Cal. App. 3d 251
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 1975Civ. 45249California2,062 words

Opinion

Opinion

Loring, J.

Robert Lane, Rose Lane and Carol Bichnevicius (collectively appellants) alleging that they were residents of the City of Redondo Beach, filed a complaint for declaratory relief naming the City of Redondo Beach, the Redevelopment Agency of Redondo Beach, and the Parking Authority of Redondo Beach (City) as defendants. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained and the plaintiffs were given 30 days to amend. A first amended complaint for declaratory relief was then filed and a demurrer sustained with leave to amend. After a second amended complaint for declaratory relief was filed, the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend. Judgment of dismissal was entered. This is an appeal from the judgment of dismissal.

Statement of Facts

The City is situated on the coast of the Pacific Ocean. By a tidelands grant dated 1915 and amended in 1971, the state granted City all tidelands adjacent to the City’s coastline. From 1955 to 1959, the federal government financed the building of a breakwater to create a public craft harbor. The voters of the City authorized a bond issue, which was held valid by the California Supreme Court in City of Redondo Beach v. Taxpayers,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.