Drasin

Drasin v. Jacoby & Meyers

Good Law
150 Cal. App. 3d 481·197 Cal. Rptr. 768·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1472
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 1984Civ. 69239California1,212 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schauer, J.

Facts

Plaintiff, Lawrence Drasin, appeals from an order of dismissal after the sustaining of a demurrer in favor of defendant and respondent, Jacoby and Meyers (Jacoby), in this action for malicious prosecution.

Drasin, an attorney, represented Gisele Yang in a marital dissolution action. Yang discharged Drasin in 1973, prior to the termination of that action. In September 1977 Yang, represented by Jacoby, filed a complaint for malpractice against Drasin. Drasin demurred on the grounds that the statute of limitations period had expired. The trial court overruled this demurrer. Two and one-half years later. Drasin filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing again that Yang’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. The trial court granted this motion.

On February 4, 1982, Drasin filed a complaint against Jacoby, alleging that Jacoby filed the action on behalf of Yang in order to obtain a “nuisance type settlement” and to gain publicity for its office. Drasin further alleged that Jacoby had been advised that the “statute of limitations had long run” and persisted in the claim for malicious reasons.

Jacoby filed a demurrer on April 19, 1982, which was sustained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.