Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers v. Pennsylvania Pipeline, Inc.

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 3d 163·162 Cal. Rptr. 851·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1564·108 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2550
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1980Civ. 43845California3,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

Pennsylvania Pipeline, Inc. (Employer) appeals from a judgment confirming an ex parte arbitration award in favor of the Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers, Building and Construction Laborers and the Construction, Production and Maintenance Laborers Local Union No. 1130 (hereafter collectively the Union). Employer contends that: 1) it never became bound by the collective bargaining agreement negotiated by the multiemployer association; 2) it was deprived of due process by the ex parte arbitration; 3) the award was contrary to public policy; and 4) venue was improperly laid. For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed.

The pertinent facts, substantially as found by the court below, are as follows: The Employer became a member of the Underground Contractors Association of Northern California, Inc. (Association) which was a party to the Laborers’ Master Agreement (Master Agreement) with the Union, and in conjunction with a number of other multiemployer associations had negotiated a contract with the Union, which ran from June 1974, to June 1977. Section 9 of the Master Agreement set forth a procedure for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.