Gutierrez

Gutierrez v. Petoseed Co.

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 3d 766·163 Cal. Rptr. 313·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1623
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 1980Civ. 56773California821 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cobey, J.

Plaintiffs, Sylvia Gutierrez, a minor, by her guardian ad litem, Ruben E. Gutierrez, Lilia Gutierrez, Valia Rios, Amparo Rios, and Maria Rios, appeal from a summary judgment in their personal injury action in favor of a defendant herein, Petoseed Company, Inc., a corporation (hereafter Petoseed). The summary judgment was apparently granted plaintiffs’ insured employer, Petoseed, on the basis that, since plaintiffs’ injuries were sustained during a lunch break on their employer’s premises, these injuries were compensable by Petoseed exclusively under the workers’ compensation law. (Lab. Code, div. 4.) We agree and will affirm for reasons that follow, although this precise question appears to be one of first impression in the courts of this state.

Facts

The injuries sued upon of the five plaintiffs occurred when each simultaneously fell on Bell Ranch (which was under lease to Petoseed) from a pickup truck they had boarded during an uncompensated lunch break on April 17, 1974. Each plaintiff was then a member of a work crew of Petoseed engaged in planting bell peppers. At the time of the accident the truck, at the direction of the employer, was being backed into the shade…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.