Tallmadge

People v. Tallmadge

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 3d 980·163 Cal. Rptr. 372·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1641
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1980Crim. 35035California2,302 words

Opinion

Opinion

Marshall, J.

Procedure

This defendant was charged with four counts:

A motion to traverse and quash the search warrant was heard and denied in the Municipal Court for the Malibu Judicial District. A preliminary hearing thereafter was held in the same court and the defendant was held to answer. A motion to dismiss the information and a motion to traverse the warrant were denied. A petition for writ of prohibition was also denied without opinion by the Court of Appeal. A petition for hearing in the Supreme Court met the same fate.

After trial by jury, a mistrial was declared on count 1 (jury unable to reach a verdict); on count 2, defendant was found guilty of possession of two items which the jury found to be machine guns (People’s exhibits 5 and 6A); mistrial was declared on count 3 (jury unable to reach a verdict). Defendant was found not guilty of count 4. He appeals from the judgment.

Facts

On February 1, 1977, Officer Duncan responded to a burglary call to go to 1646 - 19th Street, Santa Monica, a building owned by defendant. Two female employees of defendant heard a noise on the second floor of defendant’s building and a silent burglar alarm was recorded by the police. They…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.