Ramirez

Ramirez v. Superior Court

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 3d 746·163 Cal. Rptr. 223·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1621
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 1980Civ. 47011California3,971 words

Opinion

Opinion

White, J.

The question raised by this petition is whether a patient who has signed an admission agreement which complies with Code of Civil Procedure section 1295 (hereinafter section 1295) and which requires arbitration of all medical malpractice claims may resist arbitration on the ground that the agreement was not entered into knowingly and voluntarily. We conclude that the statute must be read to permit such a challenge in order to avoid constitutional defects. The trial court ordered arbitration without a clear determination of petitioners’ claim. Therefore, we will issue the writ to annul the trial court order and permit reconsideration.

On October 19, 1977, Ms. Ramirez arranged to have her pediatrician examine Corina at defendant hospital. Corina, then nine months old, had had an eight-day history-of elevated temperature, pulse, and respiration rate. At the emergency room, before her daughter was examined, Ms. Ramirez was handed a Spanish version of the arbitration agreement specified in section 1295.

Ms. Barbara Meninger, the nurse who handled the admission of Corina Ramirez, stated in her declaration that she can speak Spanish although she understands it better than she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.