Guild Wineries & Distilleries v. Land Dynamics

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 3d 966·163 Cal. Rptr. 348·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1640
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1980Civ. 40425California3,924 words

Opinion

Opinion

Christian, J.

Guild Wineries and Distilleries appeals from a judgment for respondent Land Dynamics in this action brought by appellant to enforce respondent’s obligations as the surety on a continuing guaranty.

In November 1972, appellant granted to respondent an option to purchase for $875,000 a business entity called the Kingsburg Winery, comprising real and personal property. The option was assignable, but the agreement provided that upon assignment respondent would become liable under a continuing guaranty, in favor of appellant, of the assignee’s performance.

Early in 1973 respondent, with appellant’s consent, assigned its rights as optionee to Lamb-Weston, a division of AMFAC Corporation. Lamb-Weston was required by law to obtain a winegrower’s license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control before it could operate the Kingsburg Winery; but another division of AMFAC already held a retail license, and at that time one entity could not lawfully hold both a winegrowing and a retail license. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 25500 et seq.) Appellant, with knowledge of this disability, sold the winery to Lamb-Weston. Part of the purchase price was reflected by a $725,000 promissory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.