Stockton Kenworth, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

Good Law
157 Cal. App. 3d 334·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2207·203 Cal. Rptr. 698
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1984Civ. 23728California1,515 words

Opinion

Opinion

Evans, J.

Plaintiff, a California corporation, is a retail truck dealer with its principal place of business in Stockton. Between April 1975 and March 1978, plaintiff acquired nine diesel trucks for lease to various out-of-state carriers. In acquiring the trucks, plaintiff paid neither sales nor use taxes.

After executing each of the lease agreements, plaintiff drove the trucks, sans payload, to points outside California, where the lessees took possession of the trucks and the leases commenced. Plaintiff did not report or pay any taxes to defendant, the California State Board of Equalization (Board), with respect to any of the lease transactions.

The Board determined plaintiff’s delivery of the trucks to the out-of-state lessees constituted a “use” of the trucks within California and that plaintiff was subject to tax under the Sales and Use Tax Law. (See Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6001 et seq.) Plaintiff paid the taxes assessed under protest and filed a claim for refund which was denied. Following the exhaustion of its administrative remedies, plaintiff filed an action in superior court for a refund.

The trial court determined plaintiff’s delivery of the trucks to out-of-state lessees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.