Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc.

Good Law
157 Cal. App. 3d 1154·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2272·204 Cal. Rptr. 86
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 1984Civ. 28919California2,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiener, J.

Ashton Development, Inc. and Bob Britton, Inc. appeal from the judgment awarding Rich & Whillock, Inc. $22,286.45 for the balance due under a grading and excavating contract. Following a nonjury trial the court entered judgment after it found a settlement agreement and release signed by Rich & Whillock, Inc., were the products of economic duress and thus provided no defense to its contract claim. We conclude substantial evidence supports the court’s finding and affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

On February 17, 1981, Bob Britton, president of Bob Britton, Inc., signed a contract for grading and excavating services to be provided by Rich & Whillock, Inc. at a price of $112,990. The work was to be done on a project by Ashton Development, Inc., Bob Britton, Inc., was general contractor on the project and the agent for Ashton Development, Inc., in all dealings with Rich & Whillock, Inc. Work began the day the contract was signed.

In late March 1981 Rich & Whillock, Inc., encountered rock on the project site. A meeting was held at the site to discuss the problem. In attendance were Greg Whillock and Jim Rich, president and vice-president of Rich &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.