Cidco

C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. Cidco

Good Law
184 Cal. App. 3d 55·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1892·229 Cal. Rptr. 33
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 6, 1986E001700California6,511 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kaufman, J.

Defendants John Michels, Raymond Magnon, Charles Sutherland and CIDCO appeal from a judgment of specific performance in favor of plaintiffs C. Robert Nattress & Associates and C. Robert Nattress as an individual. The judgment ordered defendants CIDCO and Sutherland to sell to plaintiffs a commercial building in the City of Riverside pursuant to an agreement for purchase and sale of the building that was expressly made subject to a right of first refusal held by defendant Michels, the building’s principal tenant. The judgment also required defendants Michels and Magnon, who had obtained title to the building from CIDCO and Sutherland by purporting to exercise Michels’ right of first refusal, to relinquish the building and transfer title to plaintiffs. Finally, the judgment required defendants CIDCO and Sutherland to pay “plaintiff” a real estate commission of $40,582. (Hereafter the appellation Sutherland shall also include CIDCO unless the context indicates otherwise.)

On appeal, defendants contend the judgment must be reversed because the evidence shows: (1) that plaintiffs failed to prove the property was unique as to them or that they were ready, willing and able to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.