Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. City & County of San Francisco

Caution
129 Cal. App. 3d 876·181 Cal. Rptr. 370·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1378
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 1982Civ. 48162California3,258 words

Opinion

Opinion

Newsom, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment which denied appellant’s claim for a refund of ad valorem taxes in the principal amount of $100,054.25, assessed and paid under protest for the fiscal year 1973-1974 on personal property allegedly owned by it. The case was tried on stipulated facts which may be summarized as follows. Appellant (hereinafter also Mass Mutual), a mutual insurance company, holds title to the Hyatt Hotel on Union Square (hereinafter hotel) and its fixtures and personal property. Under a lease agreement with the California Hyatt Corporation (hereinafter Cal Hyatt) executed on January 4, 1973, the hotel is managed and operated by Cal Hyatt. The agreement is for a term of 21 years, and grants Cal Hyatt a leasehold estate in the fixtures and equipment used in operating the hotel. Appellant retained legal title to the property; Cal Hyatt was required by the agreement to keep all of the insurable personalty in the hotel insured against loss or damage, although the risk of property loss otherwise rested with appellant. In addition, Cal Hyatt covenanted to pay any personal property taxes imposed.

The lease agreement also allowed appellant to exercise certain control…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.