Nakasone

Nakasone v. Randall

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 3d 757·181 Cal. Rptr. 324·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1365
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 15, 1982Civ. 63332California2,695 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

Defendant appeals from order denying motion to quash a prejudgment writ of attachment. The primary appellate issue is whether the claim upon which the cause of action is based arose out of the defendant’s conduct of a trade, business or profession.

On May 5, 1980, plaintiff filed suit to recover damages for breach of contract for sale of real property by defendant, a resident of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. The complaint alleges that on September 24, 1979, plaintiff agreed in writing to buy and defendant agreed to sell a certain piece of real property for $340,000. Concurrently with filing the complaint plaintiff sought and was issued an ex parte order for issuance of writ of attachment (nonresident [§ 492.010, Code Civ. Proc.]) pursuant to section 485.210, Code of Civil Procedure. A supporting declaration asserted that defendant informed plaintiff she was disposing of all of her real property because she had moved to Guadalajara, Mexico; and that she was in the process of doing so in that on January 9, 1980, she sold the real property, the subject of this lawsuit, to Chen C. Wang, on April 3, 1980, she closed escrow on real property located in Palmdale, and on a date…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.