Fitzgerald

People v. Fitzgerald

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 458·1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 689·29 Cal. App. 3d 296
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 1972Crim. 22228California6,774 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feinerman, J.

A jury found defendant Romaine Fitzgerald guilty of first degree murder of Barge Miller and fixed the penalty at death for that offense. A motion for a new trial was denied by the court.

Defendant contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction; (2) the trial court violated his constitutional rights by denying his motion for a change, of counsel and for a continuance in connection therewith; (3) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel; (4) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for pro se privileges at the jail pending and during trial; (5) the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct; (6) the trial judge committed prejudicial error in his comments regarding burden of proof; (7) his identification by witness James Coleman was the result of the deprivation of his constitutional rights to counsel and was impermissibly suggestive; (8) the trial court’s denial of his pretrial motion to suppress a fingerprint exemplar violated his constitional rights; (9) the court erred in permitting the use of a manikin made in the likeness of the victim to illustrate the medical testimony.

A number of additional contentions'are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.