Foust

Employers Casualty Insurance v. Foust

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 505·1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 697·29 Cal. App. 3d 382
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 13, 1972Civ. 12179California1,914 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gabbert, J.

This litigation arose out of an accident which occurred on August 7, 1970, when David F. Foust, a minor, was struck and injured by an automobile being driven in an allegedly negligent manner by appellant’s insured, James E. Cusick. Thereafter an action was filed against the driver by the boy’s parents, John W. and Regina C. Foust, and by David F. Foust (through his guardian ad litem, John W. Foust). The complaint alleged causes of action for loss of the child’s services ($10,000), loss of the wife’s services ($25,000), emotional distress as to the wife ($100,000), emotional distress as to the husband ($100,000), and general damages ($1,500,000).

At the time of the accident, Mr. Cusick was insured under a $25,000/ $50,000 liability policy. Pursuant to settlement negotiations, appellant paid $25,000 for a covenant not to further sue which was entered into by and between John W. Foust as guardian ad litem for David, and James E. Cusick, the driver and defendant in the personal injury action then on file. John and Regina Foust, however, reserved the right to continue suit for their alleged emotional distress and resulting physical injuries.

Appellant insurance company then…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.