Shaughnessy

Shaughnessy v. Wllsona School District

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 707·1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 725·29 Cal. App. 3d 742
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 29, 1972Civ. 39921California3,157 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dunn, J.

The Wilsona School District of Los Angeles County appeals from a judgment ordering the issuance of a writ of mandate commanding the district to reemploy two probationary teachers for the school year 1971-1972.

On July 15, 1971, Esther Shaughnessy and Dorothy Holton filed a verified petition for writ of mandate against the district. (Code Civ. Proc., §'§ 1085, 1086.) Petitioners alleged: during the school year 1970-1971 each of the petitioners was employed by defendant as a probationary teacher in a position requiring certification qualifications; by a notice dated March 11, 1971, petitioner Holton was informed that the principal of defendant school district had recommended to its board of trustees that petitioner not be reemployed for the school year 1971-1972; by a notice dated March 12, 1971 'petitioner Shaughnessy was informed of a similar recommendation that she not be reemployed for the school year 1971-1972; defendant did not inform petitioners of their right to hearings as required by Education Code section 13443, subdivision (b); acting pursuant to the recommendations, and without granting hearings to petitioners, defendant dismissed petitioners from their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.