Ponce

Ponce v. Tractor Supply Co.

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 628·1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 706·29 Cal. App. 3d 500
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1972Civ. 29679California3,656 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weinberger, J.

Respondent Joseph J. Ponce and his wife Otillia Ponce filed a complaint against Tractor Supply Co. and Doyle. Gene Bonham, to recover general damages respectively in the sums of .$500,000 and $ 100,000 for personal injuries allegedly sustained by them on February 24, 1967, when their vehicle was involved in a collision with a vehicle owned and operated by defendant Bonham, at a time when he was allegedly acting as the agent, servant and employee of defendant Tractor Supply Co.

Defendant Tractor Supply filed an answer on January 8, 1968, in which it denied that Bonham was its employee or that he was acting in the course and scope of his employment. Defendant Bonham failed to answer the complaint and. his default was entered. Subsequently on January 28, 1969, after a hearing on the default, judgments were entered in favor of Mr. Ponce in the sum of $150,000 and in favor of Mrs. Ponce in the sum' of $10,000.

On May 6, 1970, a pretrial conference order was filed, setting forth the factual and legal contentions of the plaintiffs and of defendant Tractor Supply Co. and listing the issues involved in the case. There was mention in this order of the default judgments against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.