Yamanishi

Yamanishi v. Bleily & Collishaw, Inc.

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 580·1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 704·29 Cal. App. 3d 457
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 1972Civ. 27691California1,959 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elkington, J.

Defendant Collishaw Sprinkler Co., Inc., contracted with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Seaside to construct a public park on the agency’s property. Collishaw Sprinkler Co., Inc., then entered into a subcontract with defendant Bleily & Collishaw, Inc., wherein the latter agreed to undertake certain portions of the work including landscaping, paving and grading. Bleily & Collishaw, Inc. in turn entered into “lower tier” subcontracts with (1) plaintiff Henry Yamanishi for the landscaping of the project, and (2) with Monterey Peninsula Paving & Grading, Inc. for the paving and grading. The subcontracts were prepared by Bleily & Collishaw, Inc. on a form it customarily used. Defendant United Pacific Insurance Company as surety executed a contractor’s performance bond which, as relevant here, provided that if Bleily & Collishaw, Inc. “shall fail to pay for . . . work contracted to be done” by subcontractors, that “it will pay for the same . . . .” The bond also provided that “In case suit is brought upon this bond the said surety will pay a reasonable attorney’s fee to be fixed by the court.”

Henry Yamanishi and Monterey Peninsula Paving & Grading, Inc. fully…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.