Lewis

Lewis v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 3d 518·187 Cal. Rptr. 273·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 2114
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 1982Civ. 64884California1,602 words

Opinion

Opinion

Amerian, J.

Background

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on May 19, 1981, in favor of respondent the City of Los Angeles (hereinafter City) in an action for personal injuries instituted by appellant Wakking L. Lewis, a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Margie Lewis.

On November 8, 1975, appellant was struck and seriously injured by a motorist while he was crossing the intersection at Santa Barbara and Walton Avenue. When appellant was struck he was walking inside a crosswalk which was demarcated in white.

The theory of liability set forth in the complaint is that the crosswalk, owned and maintained by the City, constituted a “concealed trap due to the heavy traf fic flow on Santa Barbara Avenue and the fact that there was no traffic signal light regulating said mid-block crosswalk.” At trial, however, appellant’s theory of liability rested solely upon the proposition that Government Code section 815.6 and Vehicle Code section 21368 imposed a mandatory duty upon the City to provide a yellow crosswalk rather than the white one used by appellant.

Together, Government Code section 815.6 and Vehicle Code section 21368 provide that the City is liable for any injuries…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.