Wilson

Wilson v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 3d 891·190 Cal. Rptr. 649·1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1582
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 1983Civ. 21977California3,611 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sparks, J.

The question to be decided is whether a binding arbitration clause in a group medical and hospital agreement governs a claim for prenatal injuries by a child who, while not a member of the group at the time of medical malpractice, becomes one at the moment of his birth.

Defendants Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (Hospitals) and Permanente Medical Group (Permanente) appeal from an order denying enforcement of an arbitration provision in a medical services contract to plaintiff’s cause of action for prenatal injuries. We hold that the arbitration clause is binding upon plaintiff and shall reverse.

Plaintiff Brett Wilson, son of Ruth and Michael Wilson, was bom at a Kaiser Hospital on February 26, 1981. His mother, Ruth, was employed by Permanente as a clinical assistant. By virtue of her employment Ruth became eligible for health care benefits under the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (Health Plan). The Health Plan is a nonprofit California corporation in the business of operating a prepaid service plan for the rendition of medical and hospital services to its subscribers and members. It contracts with defendant Permanente for medical services and with defendant Hospitals for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.