United States v. William Loveless

Good Law
635 F.3d 455
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 201110-30202California492 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 10-30202 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  6:03-cr-00022- W.P.L., a juvenile, CCL-1 Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 7, 2011* Portland, Oregon

Filed March 14, 2011

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Susan P. Graber, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

3543 3544 UNITED STATES v. W.P.L.

COUNSEL

Michael Donahoe, Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, Montana, for the defendant-appellant.

Paulette L. Stewart, Assistant United States Attorney, Helena, Montana, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Defendant W.P.L., a juvenile, appeals the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release that he register as a sex offender “if required by law.” Reviewing for abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.