Haldeman

Haldeman v. Franchise Tax Board

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 3d 373·190 Cal. Rptr. 155·1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1531
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 1983Civ. 65429California1,156 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCLOSKY, J.

Statement of Case

Appellants Harry R. Haldeman and Joanne H. Haldeman filed a “Complaint for Refund of Personal Income Taxes” for the years 1974, 1975 and 1976 against the Franchise Tax Board (hereafter Board). In a court trial on stipulated facts, the court gave judgment against appellants and in favor of respondent Board. Appellants filed a timely notice of appeal.

Statement of Facts

The operative stipulated facts on which the case was tried may be summarized as follows:

The Haldemans became residents of California on approximately June 30, 1973. At all relevant times prior to that date, Mr. Haldeman was employed as Chief of Staff for the White House and the Haldemans lived in the State of Maryland.

The Haldemans remained residents of California for the balance of 1973 and during the years 1974, 1975 and 1976. During 1974, 1975 and 1976, Mr. Haldeman earned a total of $106,200 for writing and making television appearances relating to his knowledge and personal involvement as White House Chief of Staff, including his knowledge of the so-called Watergate matters. All of that income was subject to California tax and the Haldemans reported it as such. They deducted as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.