Schlussel

Schlussel v. Schlussel

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 3d 194·190 Cal. Rptr. 95·1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1525·37 A.L.R. 4th 846
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 1983Civ. 26520California1,885 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cologne, J.

Joseph Schlussel and Bobbette Schlussel brought this action against Florence Schlussel seeking damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress for numerous obscene and threatening telephone calls Florence allegedly made to them. The defendant, a resident of New York, moved to quash service contending California lacked jurisdiction. The motion was granted and Joseph and Bobbette appeal.

Plaintiffs filed a verified complaint alleging they are residents of the State of California and, between February 10 and 21, 1981, Florence placed 13 telephone calls from Florida to Bobbette in California, making obscene and threatening statements to her concerning Bobbette and her husband. During that same period, Florence placed six calls from Florida to Joseph in California, also making obscene and threatening statements. It was alleged the purpose of these calls was to disturb the peace, quiet, privacy and dignity of the plaintiffs and it did in fact have that effect. The plaintiffs further alleged as a result of the calls they suffered humiliation, mental anguish, emotional and physical distress resulting in their injury.

Florence filed the motion to quash and included a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.