Salkin

Salkin v. California Dental Assn.

Good Law
176 Cal. App. 3d 1118·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 2506·224 Cal. Rptr. 352
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 1986G001275California3,096 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crosby, J.

May a petition in mandate alleging a member of a private professional association was denied procedural due process in a disciplinary proceeding state a cognizable cause of action where the punishment imposed is less than expulsion? Yes.

I

Orthodontist Edward S. Salkin was publicly censured by two related private professional organizations of dentists of which he is a member, the California and American Dental Associations. His petition, alleging he was denied due process in violation of the bylaws and suffered damage to his dental practice and professional reputation as a result, sought to overturn the censure and to require a new hearing of the charges against him. Both organizations demurred. They argued, and the superior court agreed, judicial review of the disciplinary procedures of private professional organizations is, as a matter of law, only available where the punishment imposed is expulsion or exclusion from membership.

The California Dental Association is a constituent organization of the American Dental Association, and Salkin belongs to both. Each organization is voluntary; and membership is not required in order to practice dentistry or any dental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.