McCarthy

People v. McCarthy

Caution
176 Cal. App. 3d 593·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 2462·222 Cal. Rptr. 291
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 1986Docket Nos. A028791, A030834California1,048 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elkington, J.

Defendant McCarthy pleaded guilty to three charges of burglary and admitted suffering a prior conviction and prison term within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). On his appeal from the judgment he urges only sentencing error. He has also filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus, charging additional sentencing error. We have consolidated the two proceedings for disposition by this court.

Having read and considered the entire record and briefs of the parties, we shall affirm the judgment and dismiss without prejudice the habeas corpus petition. Our reasons follow.

The trial court had sentenced McCarthy to a four-year midterm on one of his burglary convictions, consecutive sentences on the other two totalling two and two-thirds years, and a one-year enhancement for the prior conviction and prison term.

The Appeal

It is here contended that: “The one-year enhancement of appellant’s sentence denied him the equal protection of the law.”

The contention is founded on the provisions of Penal Code section 667.5.

Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b) as in effect at here relevant times and otherwise as relevant, provided that where one was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.