Yuping Sun v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
421 F. App'x 703
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 201108-71391California243 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Yuping Sun, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

The agency found Sun not credible because, during her hearing, she held and referred to a typewritten copy of her declaration in support of her asylum application, and provided inconsistent explanations for her possession of it. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination. See id. at 1040-44 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the Real ID Act’s “totality of the circumstances”); Malkandi v. Holder, 576 F.3d 906, 917-19 (9th Cir.2009). In the absence of credible testimony, Sun’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.