Tri Sanbudiarto v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
421 F. App'x 688
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 201108-71559California303 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Tri Sanbudiarto, native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Sanbudiarto’s untimely asylum application is excused by changed or extraordinary circumstances. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(2)(D); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 657-58 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam); Toj-Culpatan v. Holder, 612 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2010) (per cu- riam). Accordingly, Sanbudiarto’s asylum claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the instances of discrimination, the attack on Sanbudiarto’s home and the blocking of the church entrance on Christmas in 1999, did not rise to the level of past persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-18 (9th Cir.2003). In addition,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.